Congo vs Laos: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal

Congo
0 current US$
in 2020
Laos
0 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
50th
Laos rank
50th

Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time

  • Congo
  • Laos
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos, a difference of 0 current US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 50th and Laos ranks 50th of 150 countries.

Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Laos Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 0.4166 current US$ 0.4166 current US$ Laos
2000s 0 current US$ 37.43 current US$ 37.43 current US$ Laos
2010s 0 current US$ 36.37 current US$ 36.37 current US$ Laos
2020s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Congo or Laos?
Congo, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Congo and Laos?
0 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Laos?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Laos rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
Congo ranks 50th and Laos ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,872 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed