Chile vs Mauritius: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Chile
0 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
0 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
50th
Mauritius rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Chile
- Mauritius
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
Chile ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 7.44 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 7.44 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 47.03 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 47.03 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Chile or Mauritius?
- Chile, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Chile and Mauritius?
- 0 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Chile ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.