Belgium vs Laos: Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal
Belgium
0 current US$
in 2020
Laos
0 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
50th
Laos rank
50th
Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal over time
- Belgium
- Laos
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 50th and Laos ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0.4166 current US$ | 0.4166 current US$ | Laos |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 37.43 current US$ | 37.43 current US$ | Laos |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ | 36.37 current US$ | 36.37 current US$ | Laos |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal, Belgium or Laos?
- Belgium, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Laos as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal between Belgium and Laos?
- 0 current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Laos?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Laos rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal?
- Belgium ranks 50th and Laos ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital per capita, coal (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.