Bangladesh vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, oil

Bangladesh
757.12 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bangladesh rank
60th
Serbia rank
58th

Nonrenewable natural capital, oil over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Serbia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 757.12 million real chained 2019 US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 325.44 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 58th of 145 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 757.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ 325.44 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 757.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ 325.44 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 757.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ 325.44 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, oil, Bangladesh or Serbia?
Serbia, at 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 757.12 million real chained 2019 US$ in Bangladesh as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, oil between Bangladesh and Serbia?
325.44 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Bangladesh and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, oil?
Bangladesh ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 58th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, oil (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, oil. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-oil-real-chained-2019-us/bangladesh/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-oil-real-chained-2019-us/bangladesh/serbia/">Bangladesh vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, oil</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, oil (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.