Serbia vs Turkey: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas

Serbia
604.17 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Turkey
772.76 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
54th
Turkey rank
52nd

Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time

  • Serbia
  • Turkey
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199520072020

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 772.76 million real chained 2019 US$ against 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 168.59 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Turkey's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Turkey has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 54th and Turkey ranks 52nd of 148 countries.

Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.73 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.13 billion real chained 2019 US$ Turkey
2010s 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.15 billion real chained 2019 US$ 541.13 million real chained 2019 US$ Turkey
2020s 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 772.76 million real chained 2019 US$ 168.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, Serbia or Turkey?
Turkey, at 772.76 million real chained 2019 US$ against 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between Serbia and Turkey?
168.59 million real chained 2019 US$, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkey?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and Turkey rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
Serbia ranks 54th and Turkey ranks 52nd of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Turkey: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/turkiye/">Serbia vs Turkey: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.