Namibia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas

Namibia
0 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
2.14 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
78th
Suriname rank
75th

Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
01.0M2.0M3.0M199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 2.14 million real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 2.14 million real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 78th and Suriname ranks 75th of 148 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 3.14 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.14 million real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 2.99 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.99 million real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 2.48 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.48 million real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 0 real chained 2019 US$ 2.14 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.14 million real chained 2019 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, Namibia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 2.14 million real chained 2019 US$ against 0 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between Namibia and Suriname?
2.14 million real chained 2019 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
Namibia ranks 78th and Suriname ranks 75th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/namibia/suriname/">Namibia vs Suriname: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.