Chile vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas

Chile
558.58 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
604.17 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
55th
Serbia rank
54th

Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time

  • Chile
  • Serbia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ against 558.58 million real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 45.59 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 54th of 148 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 558.58 million real chained 2019 US$ 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 45.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 558.58 million real chained 2019 US$ 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 45.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 558.58 million real chained 2019 US$ 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ 45.59 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, Chile or Serbia?
Serbia, at 604.17 million real chained 2019 US$ against 558.58 million real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between Chile and Serbia?
45.59 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
Chile ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 54th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/chile/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/chile/serbia/">Chile vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.