Belarus vs Croatia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas

Belarus
114.10 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Croatia
249.89 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
62nd
Croatia rank
59th

Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M300.0M350.0M199520072020

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 249.89 million real chained 2019 US$ against 114.10 million real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 135.79 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Croatia's figure about 2.2 times Belarus's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 62nd and Croatia ranks 59th of 148 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 114.10 million real chained 2019 US$ 299.30 million real chained 2019 US$ 185.20 million real chained 2019 US$ Croatia
2000s 114.10 million real chained 2019 US$ 307.56 million real chained 2019 US$ 193.47 million real chained 2019 US$ Croatia
2010s 114.10 million real chained 2019 US$ 255.57 million real chained 2019 US$ 141.47 million real chained 2019 US$ Croatia
2020s 114.10 million real chained 2019 US$ 249.89 million real chained 2019 US$ 135.79 million real chained 2019 US$ Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, Belarus or Croatia?
Croatia, at 249.89 million real chained 2019 US$ against 114.10 million real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between Belarus and Croatia?
135.79 million real chained 2019 US$, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
Belarus ranks 62nd and Croatia ranks 59th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-natural-gas-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
148 places, 3,807 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.