FRA vs ESP: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas
FRA
0 current US$
in 2020
ESP
0 current US$
in 2020
FRA rank
59th
ESP rank
59th
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time
- FRA
- ESP
How they compare
FRA currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in ESP, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was FRA ahead.
FRA ranks 59th and ESP ranks 59th of 83 countries.
FRA has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | FRA | ESP | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 908.75 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 908.75 million current US$ | FRA |
| 2000s | 1.58 billion current US$ | 35.96 million current US$ | 1.55 billion current US$ | FRA |
| 2010s | 415.30 million current US$ | 49.24 million current US$ | 366.05 million current US$ | FRA |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, FRA or ESP?
- FRA, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in ESP as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between FRA and ESP?
- 0 current US$, with FRA ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for FRA and ESP?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do FRA and ESP rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
- FRA ranks 59th and ESP ranks 59th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.