Ecuador vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas
Ecuador
0 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
0 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
59th
South Africa rank
59th
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 59th and South Africa ranks 59th of 83 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 6.91 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 6.91 million current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 138.65 million current US$ | 12.02 million current US$ | 126.62 million current US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
- Ecuador ranks 59th and South Africa ranks 59th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.