Congo vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas
Congo
879.04 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
559.76 million current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
35th
Serbia rank
37th
Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas over time
- Congo
- Serbia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 879.04 million current US$ against 559.76 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 319.27 million current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.6 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Congo ranks 35th and Serbia ranks 37th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.90 million current US$ | 1.04 billion current US$ | 966.54 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 735.48 million current US$ | 1.81 billion current US$ | 1.08 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 879.04 million current US$ | 559.76 million current US$ | 319.27 million current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas, Congo or Serbia?
- Congo, at 879.04 million current US$ against 559.76 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas between Congo and Serbia?
- 319.27 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas?
- Congo ranks 35th and Serbia ranks 37th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, natural gas (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.