Mongolia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc

Mongolia
761.92 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
891.39 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
20th
Namibia rank
18th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc over time

  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
1.0B2.0B3.0B199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 891.39 million real chained 2019 US$ against 761.92 million real chained 2019 US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 129.47 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 18th of 142 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.77 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.37 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 1.72 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.00 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.29 billion real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 1.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.61 billion real chained 2019 US$ 519.65 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 761.92 million real chained 2019 US$ 891.39 million real chained 2019 US$ 129.47 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc, Mongolia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 891.39 million real chained 2019 US$ against 761.92 million real chained 2019 US$ in Mongolia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc between Mongolia and Namibia?
129.47 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc?
Mongolia ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 18th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-zinc-real-chained-2019-us/mongolia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-zinc-real-chained-2019-us/mongolia/namibia/">Mongolia vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
142 places, 3,668 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed