Serbia vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc
Serbia
87.47 million current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
113.73 million current US$
in 2014
Serbia rank
43rd
Tunisia rank
41st
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 113.73 million current US$ against 87.47 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 26.27 million current US$.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 41st of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.60 million current US$ | 5.14 million current US$ | 13.46 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 65.98 million current US$ | 74.80 million current US$ | 8.82 million current US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc, Serbia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 113.73 million current US$ against 87.47 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 26.27 million current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Serbia ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 41st of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.