Chile vs Philippines: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc
Chile
303.74 million current US$
in 2020
Philippines
244.29 million current US$
in 2013
Chile rank
30th
Philippines rank
32nd
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc over time
- Chile
- Philippines
How they compare
Chile currently reports 303.74 million current US$ against 244.29 million current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 59.45 million current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 30th and Philippines ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 748.14 million current US$ | 178.83 million current US$ | 569.30 million current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 426.66 million current US$ | 288.74 million current US$ | 137.93 million current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc, Chile or Philippines?
- Chile, at 303.74 million current US$ against 244.29 million current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc between Chile and Philippines?
- 59.45 million current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc?
- Chile ranks 30th and Philippines ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.