Australia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc

Australia
24.74 billion current US$
in 2020
Peru
14.23 billion current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
2nd
Peru rank
3rd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc over time

  • Australia
  • Peru
020.0B40.0B60.0B199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 24.74 billion current US$ against 14.23 billion current US$ in Peru, a difference of 10.51 billion current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.7 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and Peru ranks 3rd of 53 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 11.68 billion current US$ 3.02 billion current US$ 8.65 billion current US$ Australia
2000s 19.42 billion current US$ 13.00 billion current US$ 6.41 billion current US$ Australia
2010s 24.55 billion current US$ 18.26 billion current US$ 6.30 billion current US$ Australia
2020s 24.74 billion current US$ 14.23 billion current US$ 10.51 billion current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc, Australia or Peru?
Australia, at 24.74 billion current US$ against 14.23 billion current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc between Australia and Peru?
10.51 billion current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Peru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc?
Australia ranks 2nd and Peru ranks 3rd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-zinc-current-us/australia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-zinc-current-us/australia/peru/">Australia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: zinc (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 1,086 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed