Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin

Mexico
1.03 million current US$
in 2008
Zimbabwe
0 current US$
in 1999
Mexico rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
3rd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin over time

  • Mexico
  • Zimbabwe
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M199520012008

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 1.03 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.03 million current US$.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 25 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
Mexico, at 1.03 million current US$ against 0 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2008.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
1.03 million current US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 1999.
How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin?
Mexico ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
25 places, 498 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed