Australia vs Malaysia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin
Australia
0 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
0 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Malaysia rank
3rd
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin over time
- Australia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 3rd and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2010s | 38.48 million current US$ | 40.09 million current US$ | 1.61 million current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin, Australia or Malaysia?
- Australia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin between Australia and Malaysia?
- 0 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Malaysia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin?
- Australia ranks 3rd and Malaysia ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: tin (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.