Georgia vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total

Georgia
2.67 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
2.37 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
63rd
Serbia rank
65th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time

  • Georgia
  • Serbia
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 2.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.37 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 294.01 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 65th of 151 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.63 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.74 billion real chained 2019 US$ 885.37 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2010s 3.10 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.57 billion real chained 2019 US$ 528.67 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2020s 2.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.37 billion real chained 2019 US$ 294.01 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Georgia or Serbia?
Georgia, at 2.67 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 2.37 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Georgia and Serbia?
294.01 million real chained 2019 US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
Georgia ranks 63rd and Serbia ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/serbia/">Georgia vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.