Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total

Papua New Guinea
44.11 billion current US$
in 2020
Sweden
40.30 billion current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
20th
Sweden rank
21st

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sweden
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 44.11 billion current US$ against 40.30 billion current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 3.81 billion current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 21st of 116 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 5.37 billion current US$ 7.54 billion current US$ 2.17 billion current US$ Sweden
2000s 10.44 billion current US$ 24.83 billion current US$ 14.39 billion current US$ Sweden
2010s 14.16 billion current US$ 31.43 billion current US$ 17.27 billion current US$ Sweden
2020s 44.11 billion current US$ 40.30 billion current US$ 3.81 billion current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Papua New Guinea or Sweden?
Papua New Guinea, at 44.11 billion current US$ against 40.30 billion current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Papua New Guinea and Sweden?
3.81 billion current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sweden rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
Papua New Guinea ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 21st of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/papua-new-guinea/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/papua-new-guinea/sweden/">Papua New Guinea vs Sweden: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
116 places, 2,824 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed