Croatia vs Oman: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total
Croatia
1.16 million current US$
in 2020
Oman
406,985 current US$
in 2017
Croatia rank
109th
Oman rank
110th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time
- Croatia
- Oman
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1.16 million current US$ against 406,985 current US$ in Oman, a difference of 754,265 current US$.
That makes Croatia's figure about 2.9 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Oman ahead.
Croatia ranks 109th and Oman ranks 110th of 116 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95,868 current US$ | 5.64 million current US$ | 5.54 million current US$ | Oman |
| 2010s | 820,369 current US$ | 540.64 million current US$ | 539.82 million current US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Croatia or Oman?
- Croatia, at 1.16 million current US$ against 406,985 current US$ in Oman as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Croatia and Oman?
- 754,265 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Oman?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Oman rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
- Croatia ranks 109th and Oman ranks 110th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.