Congo vs United Kingdom: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total

Congo
17.79 million current US$
in 2017
United Kingdom
19.18 million current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
103rd
United Kingdom rank
102nd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time

  • Congo
  • United Kingdom
0200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 19.18 million current US$ against 17.79 million current US$ in Congo, a difference of 1.40 million current US$.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 103rd and United Kingdom ranks 102nd of 116 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1990s 109.71 million current US$ 3.13 million current US$ 106.58 million current US$ Congo
2000s 5.93 million current US$ 6.99 million current US$ 1.07 million current US$ United Kingdom
2010s 20.60 million current US$ 11.08 million current US$ 9.51 million current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Congo or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 19.18 million current US$ against 17.79 million current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Congo and United Kingdom?
1.40 million current US$, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and United Kingdom?
21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
How do Congo and United Kingdom rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
Congo ranks 103rd and United Kingdom ranks 102nd of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs United Kingdom: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/congo-rep/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/congo-rep/united-kingdom/">Congo vs United Kingdom: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
116 places, 2,824 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed