Congo vs Malawi: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total
Congo
17.79 million current US$
in 2017
Malawi
4.78 million current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
103rd
Malawi rank
104th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time
- Congo
- Malawi
How they compare
Congo currently reports 17.79 million current US$ against 4.78 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 13.00 million current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 3.7 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malawi ahead.
Congo ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 116 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Congo or Malawi?
- Congo, at 17.79 million current US$ against 4.78 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2017.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Congo and Malawi?
- 13.00 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
- How do Congo and Malawi rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
- Congo ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.