Chad vs Croatia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total
Chad
1.75 million current US$
in 2016
Croatia
1.16 million current US$
in 2020
Chad rank
107th
Croatia rank
109th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time
- Chad
- Croatia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 1.75 million current US$ against 1.16 million current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 592,300 current US$.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.5 times Croatia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 107th and Croatia ranks 109th of 116 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 million current US$ | 95,868 current US$ | 3.67 million current US$ | Chad |
| 2010s | 2.38 million current US$ | 647,965 current US$ | 1.73 million current US$ | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Chad or Croatia?
- Chad, at 1.75 million current US$ against 1.16 million current US$ in Croatia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Chad and Croatia?
- 592,300 current US$, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Croatia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Chad and Croatia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
- Chad ranks 107th and Croatia ranks 109th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.