Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total

Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.53 billion current US$
in 2020
Serbia
3.20 billion current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
69th
Serbia rank
66th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Serbia
02.0B4.0B6.0B199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 3.20 billion current US$ against 2.53 billion current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 669.49 million current US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Serbia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 66th of 116 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 1.92 billion current US$ 497.61 million current US$ 1.42 billion current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 2.52 billion current US$ 2.97 billion current US$ 448.89 million current US$ Serbia
2020s 2.53 billion current US$ 3.20 billion current US$ 669.49 million current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
Serbia, at 3.20 billion current US$ against 2.53 billion current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
669.49 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 66th of 116 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-sub-index-total-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/serbia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals, sub-index, total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
116 places, 2,824 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed