Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver

Georgia
24.20 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
13.51 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
37th
Saudi Arabia rank
40th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Georgia
  • Saudi Arabia
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 24.20 million real chained 2019 US$ against 13.51 million real chained 2019 US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 10.69 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.8 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Georgia ranks 37th and Saudi Arabia ranks 40th of 138 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 47.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 21.79 million real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2000s 25.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 33.61 million real chained 2019 US$ 7.67 million real chained 2019 US$ Saudi Arabia
2010s 25.38 million real chained 2019 US$ 19.48 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.90 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2020s 24.20 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.69 million real chained 2019 US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Georgia or Saudi Arabia?
Georgia, at 24.20 million real chained 2019 US$ against 13.51 million real chained 2019 US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
10.69 million real chained 2019 US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
Georgia ranks 37th and Saudi Arabia ranks 40th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/georgia/saudi-arabia/">Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed