Finland vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver

Finland
115.27 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
169.42 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Finland rank
23rd
South Africa rank
21st

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Finland
  • South Africa
200.0M400.0M600.0M199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 169.42 million real chained 2019 US$ against 115.27 million real chained 2019 US$ in Finland, a difference of 54.15 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.5 times Finland's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 21st of 138 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 241.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 572.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 331.03 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 217.88 million real chained 2019 US$ 383.88 million real chained 2019 US$ 166.00 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 153.19 million real chained 2019 US$ 231.41 million real chained 2019 US$ 78.21 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 115.27 million real chained 2019 US$ 169.42 million real chained 2019 US$ 54.15 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Finland or South Africa?
South Africa, at 169.42 million real chained 2019 US$ against 115.27 million real chained 2019 US$ in Finland as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Finland and South Africa?
54.15 million real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Finland and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
Finland ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 21st of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/finland/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/finland/south-africa/">Finland vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed