Ecuador vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver

Ecuador
7.78 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
10.49 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
45th
Namibia rank
43rd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 10.49 million real chained 2019 US$ against 7.78 million real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 2.70 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 43rd of 138 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 31.85 million real chained 2019 US$ 40.11 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.26 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 29.59 million real chained 2019 US$ 25.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 4.08 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 17.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.22 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.56 million real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 7.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.49 million real chained 2019 US$ 2.70 million real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Ecuador or Namibia?
Namibia, at 10.49 million real chained 2019 US$ against 7.78 million real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Ecuador and Namibia?
2.70 million real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
Ecuador ranks 45th and Namibia ranks 43rd of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed