Australia vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver

Australia
5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China
6.78 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
China rank
2nd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Australia
  • China
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 6.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 1.59 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 3rd and China ranks 2nd of 138 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia China Difference Ahead
1990s 1.72 billion real chained 2019 US$ 5.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.52 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2000s 2.06 billion real chained 2019 US$ 4.74 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.68 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2010s 4.94 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.73 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.59 billion real chained 2019 US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Australia or China?
China, at 6.78 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Australia and China?
1.59 billion real chained 2019 US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and China rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
Australia ranks 3rd and China ranks 2nd of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/australia/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/australia/china/">Australia vs China: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed