Australia vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver

Australia
5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile
3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
3rd
Chile rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Australia
  • Chile
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 1.97 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.6 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Australia ranks 3rd and Chile ranks 6th of 138 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 1.72 billion real chained 2019 US$ 10.46 billion real chained 2019 US$ 8.74 billion real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2000s 2.06 billion real chained 2019 US$ 9.28 billion real chained 2019 US$ 7.21 billion real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2010s 4.94 billion real chained 2019 US$ 6.90 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ 3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.97 billion real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Australia or Chile?
Australia, at 5.19 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 3.22 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Australia and Chile?
1.97 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
Australia ranks 3rd and Chile ranks 6th of 138 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-silver-real-chained-2019-us/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
138 places, 3,559 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed