Namibia vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver
Namibia
24.27 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
27.41 million current US$
in 2016
Namibia rank
43rd
Serbia rank
41st
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Namibia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 27.41 million current US$ against 24.27 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 3.14 million current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 41st of 74 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.47 million current US$ | 17.53 million current US$ | 35.93 million current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 26.69 million current US$ | 38.07 million current US$ | 11.38 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Namibia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 27.41 million current US$ against 24.27 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Namibia and Serbia?
- 3.14 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Namibia and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
- Namibia ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 41st of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.