Korea vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver
Korea
24.40 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
27.41 million current US$
in 2016
Korea rank
42nd
Serbia rank
41st
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Korea
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 27.41 million current US$ against 24.40 million current US$ in Korea, a difference of 3.01 million current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Korea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Korea ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 41st of 74 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.02 million current US$ | 13.53 million current US$ | 5.51 million current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 15.58 million current US$ | 38.07 million current US$ | 22.49 million current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Korea or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 27.41 million current US$ against 24.40 million current US$ in Korea as of 2016.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Korea and Serbia?
- 3.01 million current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Serbia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Korea and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
- Korea ranks 42nd and Serbia ranks 41st of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.