Brazil vs Serbia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver
Brazil
39.59 million current US$
in 2020
Serbia
27.41 million current US$
in 2016
Brazil rank
40th
Serbia rank
41st
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time
- Brazil
- Serbia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 39.59 million current US$ against 27.41 million current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 12.18 million current US$.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 41st of 74 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.86 million current US$ | 17.53 million current US$ | 101.33 million current US$ | Brazil |
| 2010s | 144.44 million current US$ | 38.07 million current US$ | 106.37 million current US$ | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Brazil or Serbia?
- Brazil, at 39.59 million current US$ against 27.41 million current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Brazil and Serbia?
- 12.18 million current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Brazil and Serbia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
- Brazil ranks 40th and Serbia ranks 41st of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.