Botswana vs Namibia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver

Botswana
15.10 million current US$
in 2016
Namibia
24.27 million current US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
46th
Namibia rank
43rd

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 24.27 million current US$ against 15.10 million current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 9.17 million current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Namibia ahead.

Botswana ranks 46th and Namibia ranks 43rd of 74 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver, Botswana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 24.27 million current US$ against 15.10 million current US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver between Botswana and Namibia?
9.17 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2016.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver?
Botswana ranks 46th and Namibia ranks 43rd of 74 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: silver (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
74 places, 1,428 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed