Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Türkiye
108.89 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
12.28 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Türkiye rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Türkiye
  • Zimbabwe
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M199520072020

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 108.89 million real chained 2019 US$ against 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 96.61 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 8.9 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Türkiye ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 145 countries.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Türkiye Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 113.90 million real chained 2019 US$ 18.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 95.24 million real chained 2019 US$ Türkiye
2000s 113.90 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.26 million real chained 2019 US$ 98.64 million real chained 2019 US$ Türkiye
2010s 112.30 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.07 million real chained 2019 US$ 99.23 million real chained 2019 US$ Türkiye
2020s 108.89 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 96.61 million real chained 2019 US$ Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Türkiye or Zimbabwe?
Türkiye, at 108.89 million real chained 2019 US$ against 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
96.61 million real chained 2019 US$, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Türkiye and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Türkiye ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/turkiye/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/turkiye/zimbabwe/">Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed