Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Sri Lanka
6.57 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
12.28 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Zimbabwe
5.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ against 6.57 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 5.70 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Sri Lanka's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Sri Lanka ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 145 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 7.82 million real chained 2019 US$ 18.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.84 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 7.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.26 million real chained 2019 US$ 7.78 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 6.90 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.07 million real chained 2019 US$ 6.16 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 6.57 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 5.70 million real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ against 6.57 million real chained 2019 US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
5.70 million real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Sri Lanka ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/sri-lanka/zimbabwe/">Sri Lanka vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed