Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Mali
21.06 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
12.28 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mali rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Mali
  • Zimbabwe
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M199520072020

How they compare

Mali currently reports 21.06 million real chained 2019 US$ against 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.79 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.7 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 145 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 22.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 18.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.46 million real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2000s 22.12 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.26 million real chained 2019 US$ 6.86 million real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2010s 21.83 million real chained 2019 US$ 13.07 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.76 million real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2020s 21.06 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.79 million real chained 2019 US$ Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Mali or Zimbabwe?
Mali, at 21.06 million real chained 2019 US$ against 12.28 million real chained 2019 US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Mali and Zimbabwe?
8.79 million real chained 2019 US$, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Mali ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/mali/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/mali/zimbabwe/">Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed