Jordan vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Jordan
1.30 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
906.93 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Jordan rank
6th
South Africa rank
8th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Jordan
  • South Africa
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B199520072020

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 906.93 million real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 389.05 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.4 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Jordan ranks 6th and South Africa ranks 8th of 145 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 933.11 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.23 billion real chained 2019 US$ 297.73 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 1.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ 971.71 million real chained 2019 US$ 680.66 million real chained 2019 US$ Jordan
2010s 2.05 billion real chained 2019 US$ 971.44 million real chained 2019 US$ 1.08 billion real chained 2019 US$ Jordan
2020s 1.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ 906.93 million real chained 2019 US$ 389.05 million real chained 2019 US$ Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Jordan or South Africa?
Jordan, at 1.30 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 906.93 million real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Jordan and South Africa?
389.05 million real chained 2019 US$, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Jordan ranks 6th and South Africa ranks 8th of 145 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/jordan/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-real-chained-2019-us/jordan/south-africa/">Jordan vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
145 places, 3,729 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed