Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Tanzania, United Republic of
4.41 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
3.94 million current US$
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
11th
Zimbabwe rank
12th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
050.0M100.0M150.0M199520072020

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.41 million current US$ against 3.94 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 472,520 current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 41 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
2000s 13.61 million current US$ 26.14 million current US$ 12.53 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 42.31 million current US$ 44.44 million current US$ 2.13 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 4.41 million current US$ 3.94 million current US$ 472,520 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.41 million current US$ against 3.94 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
472,520 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-current-us/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-current-us/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
41 places, 877 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed