Saudi Arabia vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Saudi Arabia
0 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
0 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia rank
16th
Tunisia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Tunisia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 373.83 million current US$ | 11.47 billion current US$ | 11.10 billion current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2.25 billion current US$ | 2.00 billion current US$ | 246.47 million current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Saudi Arabia or Tunisia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
- 0 current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.