Mexico vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Mexico
0 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
0 current US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
16th
Tunisia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Mexico
- Tunisia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2000s | 575.78 million current US$ | 2.49 billion current US$ | 1.92 billion current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 555.03 million current US$ | 2.00 billion current US$ | 1.45 billion current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Mexico or Tunisia?
- Mexico, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Mexico and Tunisia?
- 0 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Mexico ranks 16th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.