Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Mexico
0 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
0 current US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
16th
Sri Lanka rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Mexico
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mexico ranks 16th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 575.78 million current US$ | 33.93 million current US$ | 541.85 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2010s | 555.03 million current US$ | 46.00 million current US$ | 509.03 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
- Mexico, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 0 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Mexico ranks 16th and Sri Lanka ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.