Mali vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Mali
7.86 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
3.94 million current US$
in 2020
Mali rank
10th
Zimbabwe rank
12th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Mali
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mali currently reports 7.86 million current US$ against 3.94 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.92 million current US$.
That makes Mali's figure about 2.0 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mali ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.89 million current US$ | 36.49 million current US$ | 15.60 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 7.86 million current US$ | 3.94 million current US$ | 3.92 million current US$ | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Mali or Zimbabwe?
- Mali, at 7.86 million current US$ against 3.94 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 3.92 million current US$, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Mali ranks 10th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.