Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Malawi
722,071 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
3.94 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
14th
Zimbabwe rank
12th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 3.94 million current US$ against 722,071 current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 3.22 million current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.5 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malawi ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 41 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.01 million current US$ | 20.31 million current US$ | 11.30 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 722,071 current US$ | 3.94 million current US$ | 3.22 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 3.94 million current US$ against 722,071 current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 3.22 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Malawi ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.