Malawi vs Tunisia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Malawi
722,071 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
0 current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
14th
Tunisia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Malawi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 722,071 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 722,071 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tunisia ahead.
Malawi ranks 14th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.01 million current US$ | 1.54 billion current US$ | 1.53 billion current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 722,071 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 722,071 current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Malawi or Tunisia?
- Malawi, at 722,071 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Malawi and Tunisia?
- 722,071 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Malawi and Tunisia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Malawi ranks 14th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.