Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Malawi
722,071 current US$
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
4.41 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
14th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
11th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Malawi
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050.0M100.0M150.0M199520072020

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.41 million current US$ against 722,071 current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 3.69 million current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 6.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 14th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 41 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2010s 11.97 million current US$ 45.36 million current US$ 33.39 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 722,071 current US$ 4.41 million current US$ 3.69 million current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Malawi or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.41 million current US$ against 722,071 current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
3.69 million current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
6 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Malawi ranks 14th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 11th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-current-us/malawi/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-current-us/malawi/tanzania/">Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
41 places, 877 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed