Iraq vs Saudi Arabia: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Iraq
0 current US$
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
0 current US$
in 2020
Iraq rank
16th
Saudi Arabia rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Iraq
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.43 million current US$ | 373.83 million current US$ | 287.40 million current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 167.44 million current US$ | 3.40 billion current US$ | 3.23 billion current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Iraq or Saudi Arabia?
- Iraq, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Iraq and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 current US$, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Saudi Arabia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Iraq and Saudi Arabia rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Iraq ranks 16th and Saudi Arabia ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.