Iraq vs Pakistan: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Iraq
0 current US$
in 2014
Pakistan
0 current US$
in 2020
Iraq rank
16th
Pakistan rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Iraq
- Pakistan
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Pakistan, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Pakistan ahead.
Iraq ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 12.19 million current US$ | 12.91 million current US$ | 720,490 current US$ | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 167.44 million current US$ | 103.38 million current US$ | 64.06 million current US$ | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Iraq or Pakistan?
- Iraq, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Iraq and Pakistan?
- 0 current US$, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Pakistan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2014.
- How do Iraq and Pakistan rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Iraq ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.