Indonesia vs Peru: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Indonesia
766,550 current US$
in 2015
Peru
0 current US$
in 2020
Indonesia rank
13th
Peru rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Indonesia
- Peru
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 766,550 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 766,550 current US$.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 13th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | β |
| 2000s | 289,654 current US$ | 16.93 million current US$ | 16.64 million current US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 1.07 million current US$ | 3.01 billion current US$ | 3.01 billion current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Indonesia or Peru?
- Indonesia, at 766,550 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Peru as of 2015.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Indonesia and Peru?
- 766,550 current US$, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Peru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
- How do Indonesia and Peru rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Indonesia ranks 13th and Peru ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.