Finland vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate

Finland
448.31 million current US$
in 2020
South Africa
283.51 million current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
3rd
South Africa rank
6th

Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time

  • Finland
  • South Africa
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B199520072020

How they compare

Finland currently reports 448.31 million current US$ against 283.51 million current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 164.79 million current US$.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.6 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Finland ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 6th of 41 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 0 current US$ 0 current US$
2000s 715.54 million current US$ 1.98 billion current US$ 1.27 billion current US$ South Africa
2010s 1.36 billion current US$ 2.74 billion current US$ 1.37 billion current US$ South Africa
2020s 448.31 million current US$ 283.51 million current US$ 164.79 million current US$ Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Finland or South Africa?
Finland, at 448.31 million current US$ against 283.51 million current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Finland and South Africa?
164.79 million current US$, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Finland and South Africa rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
Finland ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 6th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-current-us/finland/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/nonrenewable-natural-capital-metals-and-minerals-phosphate-current-us/finland/south-africa/">Finland vs South Africa: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
41 places, 877 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed