Colombia vs Mexico: Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate
Colombia
0 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
0 current US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
16th
Mexico rank
16th
Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate over time
- Colombia
- Mexico
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 16th of 41 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 26.02 million current US$ | 575.78 million current US$ | 549.75 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2010s | 22.45 million current US$ | 555.03 million current US$ | 532.58 million current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate, Colombia or Mexico?
- Colombia, at 0 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate between Colombia and Mexico?
- 0 current US$, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Mexico rank globally for nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate?
- Colombia ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 16th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Nonrenewable natural capital, metals and minerals: phosphate (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.